Guys, great comments. Just ome answers:
-
there is a possibility to comment on each submission. This is done because multiple submissions are confusing for the reviewers (feedback from last year). Sure, it’s through disqus, but I think commenting is a good thing. Maybe we can improve the user experience of commenting rather than adding more submissions?
-
I do not follow - why do you need to know submitters before the submissions? Like in any research, their names will be published in the final result. You can find the submission process in the methodology section.
-
We have tried to make this as participative as possible, and it takes time to learn. Why the community needs to decide who are the reviewers? We also wrote about the process here.
Guys, feedback is great, but I need more information in order to know how to improve it, specific examples would be good.