Align census methodology to latest open definition


The next version of the open definition is edging closer to release read the draft. Do we need to review the census methodology to make sure it is aligned?


I think that besides the point of Open Machine readable, we are alligned. Is there is something specific you mean?


Currently data should available in bulk.
Whilst not finalised, the draft now requires that data must be provided in bulk.
So does the weight for the bulk question need to increase?


Let’s loop @rufuspollock in on that…


My understanding was always that bulk was a must and it was simply that in the past we weren’t very clear on SHOULD vs MUST in the RFC sense (so old should was really a must).


Great! The census method is aligned with the open definition.