Hello, @ppkrauss.
That is one of the reasons I asked on another topic to clarify the eligibility criteria for the National Laws dataset, as the measurement parameters should be uniform across all countries.
Suppose the criteria is “having the content is required, but it is not required that the content is structured and broken down into its constituent parts of the text”. In that case, I think that if a dataset does not have the content, but does provide a link to the full (even if unstructured) content, as LexML does, I think it would qualify.
As I mentioned before, I think the metadata returned by this query is very little, and might not be enough to qualify for the criteria established in the metodology:
Also, a proper RESTful webservice should also include a dereferenceable HTTP URI besides the URN. But that is beyond the point of the discussion here.
According to @tlacoyodefrijol, this is because the review process has not yet started, but should begin at some time in this month of January.