License compatibility as imperative?

We should discuss CDLA-Permissive-2.0 when it is submitted, which I understand it will be.

FWIW I’m not concerned about this. It was looked at by CC (thus the quote in the press release), and by me (I will of course recuse myself from voting for approval, as I did with O-UDA-1.0, which is one of CDLA-Permissive-2.0’s two parents).