I don’t completely understand how things are evaluated here: when only some parts are present as open formats, the whole dataset is still indicated as open format? The reviewer explicitly says she confirms the content of bills are only available as html and pdf, but the whole dataset is marked as open and machine readable format. Does OKF now considers having a website and pdf files is sufficient requirement to be Open Data?
Also how come when some required elements like votes here are only partially published for some bills, it is still considered as OK?
Once again I feel like the method lacks in precision, saying things are fine when they are not is totally counter productive… Since multiple datasets are required per entry, the final result should reflect when things are only partial.