Thanks for getting back. UNfortunately the license is not openly licensed. I see that you have highlighted the passage which explains use restrictions. The problem is that according to the OpenDefinition 2.1 "the license must not discriminate against any person or group." This is an absolute requirement for legal openness, and once one user group is excluded from re-use or commercial use, the license is not open.
I'm also not sure I understand why members of DANE should not be granted rights to commercialise this data if anyone else is able to commercialise it. It would be interesting to hear from you what the reasons are. We will be doing more substantial research around this and want to assist governments where we can. So any feedback why you restrict commercialisation to some groups are more than welcome!
For any further questions how to design an open license please consult our open definition working group.