This is a discussion about the submission for emissions / no.
It would be helpful to get more information from the reviewer on what is meant by "Data quality in source is questionable.".
It seems like the actualy data has not been surveyed, and the data source only been reviewed on the basis of a description on the website?
Drawbacks for the entry is:
- Requires registration (your email gets put on an email list where service interruptions etc. are announced)
- No open licence
- Bulk-download (unsure about this)
Thus, I believe this category to be scored too low.
Would be great to get more feedback here, so that we can forward this to the organization in charge, and they know more precisely what to improve upon.