This is a discussion about the submission for spending / jp.
Hi @Masa@Tomoaki_Watanabe and @nyampire - I re-evaluated the data for spending, and could not find the transactional spending , so unless I will find transactions, I will have to take off points for Japan in this category. Can you please send me a transactional data example?
As I wrote on the “GLOBAL OPEN DATA INDEX: SURVEY” site, you can see the data here. It is called “行政事業レビューシート”. It contains individual record of project which is the name of government office, name of vendor, national corporate number of the vendor, amount of the transaction, type of the contract and so on.
I am a bit confused - it says the data is from 2008. Is that a Japanese year ? @nyampire - I cant see the transactional data by department, only aggregated data. I didnt open the dump yet, so will look at it too
Each ministries has published their transaction data with PDF and Excel by month.
This data contains following columns. So I think it could fulfill the requirements.
名称、場所、期間及び種別 : name of transaction record
契約担当官等の氏名並びにその所属する部局の名称及び所在地: department/office which has took charge
Japanese ministries has their Project base budget besides of above transactions.
Each ministries make their “行政レビューシート/Review sheet” as @Masa mentioned above.
The budget and justification are examined in this sheet, and also, if the Project is multi-year project, the vendors of last year must be described.
Each projects are enrolled at the end of Japanese business year (end of March).
So only the fiscal year is described in that sheet.
They are published under “政府標準利用規約/Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use” ver 2.0 which defines those data are free to use, no charge and compatibility with CC BY 4.0, etc.
Although it is not submitted to Conformant Licenses, it is considered as Open (e.g. submission for budget)
I checked it again and say the data does not comply with our spending data definition ( see this blogpost for further explanations). In each of the data there is some key information missing, either the receiver (third-party receiving money) or the transaction amount per each individual transaction (aggregates by month or quarter do not comply, it must be possible to see how much money has been spent throughout the month). As an example, we accepted Colombia’s spending data which allowed to infer how much money has been paid by seeing the total contracted amount, and a percentage how much has been paid to whom at what date. Over time it is possible to trace this percentage and infer how much money has been paid for each transaction.
Regarding your submission I found the following:
予算の支出状況 (庁費及び職員旅費の支出状況)( Executed budget split by month or quarter)
補助金等交付決定 (The header of the spreadsheet says it is “Expenditure status per quarter”, but I can only see the third-party entity contracted, the contract amount + the date of a contract)
委託調査費関連 (same as above)
タクシー代に関する支出状況 ( Payment for taxi rides are split by month. We do not see the company receiving payments, only total amount of taxi ride available)
METI produces aggregated expenditure data for office equipment, etc. aggregated by quarter, not containing the company or products purchased, or the amount paid per transaction
Therefore I state that this data is not compliant with our spending criteria.